Conférence NOVATECH 2023 - Inscription Correction

Reviewing Grid

Paper code

The paper code is available on the detailed form of the paper you are reviewing.

Main criteria

1 - Compatibility between the abstract and the themes of the conference

0 – Off topic / 3 – Insufficient compatibility / 6 – Average compatibility / – The paper can be taken into account / 10 – Excellent compatibility

2 - Innovative paper (original approach, interesting subject, results never published before…)

0 – No innovation at all / 3 – Insufficient innovation / 6 – Relative innovation but the subject is interesting / 10 – Very innovative work

3 - Transferability of the information and the project (i.e. can be used for other projects – the research is usefull for practitionners)

0 – Not transferable / 3 – Transferability to be demonstrated / 6 – Average transferability / 10 – Excellent transferability

4 - Paper clarity (approach, targets, conclusion), quality of described work

0 – Not understandable / 3 – Understandable but poor arguments / 6 – Understandable and good arguments / 10 – The abstract is very clear with excellent arguments

Final choice

According to me, this abstract:

Thierry Maytraud Trophies

This abstract is likely to be finalist for the Thierry Maytraud Trophies

Regarding the 4 following criteria (specific to the Trophies), rate this paper from 0 to 10:

Stormwater integration in the project / The inclusion of the project in a sustainable development approach (environment, economy, society) / The governance and multi-partner approach of the project / The exemplarity of the project.

In which Trophies category would you classify this abstract?

Comment

Poster - Starting research projects

This paper, although it does not provide enough results, offers interesting perspectives and opens the discussion. It can therefore be part of a poster session dedicated to starting projects.

Pedagogy session

This paper could be part of a specialized session dedicated to sharing teaching approaches and materials.

Theme of the paper (one choice)

Approach of the paper (one choice)

Comment for the reviewing committee

Comment for the author